4.6 Article

Longitudinal assessment of spiral artery and intravillous arteriole blood flow and adverse pregnancy outcome

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 350-357

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.23760

Keywords

Doppler; fetal growth restriction; intravillous flow; pre-eclampsia; spiral artery

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [1 U01 HD087213-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of flow velocity waveforms in the spiral arteries (SA) and intravillous fetal arterioles (IVA) measured using superb microvascular imaging (SMI) technology for fetal growth restriction (FGR), gestational hypertension (GH), and/or pre-eclampsia (PE). The study found that in uncomplicated pregnancies, the SA-RI decreased progressively with advancing gestation, while the IVA-RI increased. In the third trimester, the mean SA-RI and IVA-RI values were significantly higher in the FGR group and PE group, respectively. SA-RI was significantly higher in pregnancies with adverse outcomes compared to uncomplicated pregnancies. The areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves (AUC) for SA-RI and IVA-RI in screening for FGR were moderate.
Objective Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) has been shown to improve visualization of small vessels by suppressing global motions while preserving low-flow components, such as the microvessels in the placenta. We sought to determine if SMI-aided visualization of flow velocity waveforms in the spiral arteries (SA) and intravillous fetal arterioles (IVA) could predict fetal growth restriction (FGR), gestational hypertension (GH) and/or pre-eclampsia (PE). Methods This was a prospective longitudinal study of singleton pregnancies without fetal anomaly, receiving prenatal care in one of two medical centers over a 5-year period. Using SMI-aided color Doppler, SA and IVA flow velocity was measured at three timepoints: 11 + 0 to 14 + 0, 18 + 0 to 22 + 6 and 28 + 0 to 34 + 6weeks of gestation. SA and IVA flow velocity waveforms were reported as resistance indices (RI). RI values were analyzed using multilevel modeling; individual regression curves were estimated and combined to obtain the reference intervals for SA-RI and IVA-RI in uncomplicated pregnancies. The primary clinical outcome was FGR and secondary outcomes were PE and GH. FGR was defined as estimated fetal weight < 10th percentile. Student's t-test was used to compare deviation from expected RI between normal and complicated pregnancies. Results Among 540 pregnancies included in the analysis, 18 (3.3%) had FGR, 31 (5.7%) PE and 61 (11.3%) GH. In uncomplicated pregnancies, the SA-RI decreased progressively with advancing gestation, whereas the IVA-RI increased with gestational age. In the third trimester, the mean SA-RI and IVA-RI values were significantly higher in the FGR group compared with pregnancies that did not develop FGR, while the mean SA-RI was significantly higher in PE compared with non-PE pregnancies. There was no significant difference in mean SA-RI or IVA-RI between pregnancies with vs those without GH at any gestational age. When all three adverse outcomes were combined, SA-RI was significantly higher in pregnancies with these outcomes when compared to uncomplicated pregnancies in the third trimester (mean +/- SD, 0.29 +/- 0.12 vs 0.26 +/- 0.12; P=0.02). In screening for FGR using SA-RI, the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves (AUC) were 0.68, 0.73 and 0.73 in the first, second and third trimesters, respectively. The respective AUCs for IVA-RI were 0.72, 0.72 and 0.73 for each trimester. Conclusions SA-RI and IVA-RI, measured using SMI technology, were significantly higher in pregnancies at risk for FGR in late gestation. Larger studies are needed to determine if SA and IVA flow are reliable predictors of adverse pregnancy outcome. (C) 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available