4.7 Review

3D-bioprinted cancer-on-a-chip: level-up organotypic in vitro models

Journal

TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 432-447

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.08.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. national funds through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES [UIDB/50011/2020, UIDP/50011/2020]
  2. Programa Operacional Competitividade e InternacionalizacAo (POCI), in the component FEDER
  3. FCT/MCTES [PTDC/BTM-SAL/30503/2017]
  4. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [DFA/BD/7692/20 20, CEEC/1048/2019]
  5. National Institutes of Health [R21EB025270, R00CA201603, R01EB028143]
  6. Brigham Research Institute
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BTM-SAL/30503/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of organ-on-a-chip platforms with additive manufacturing technologies offers a disruptive approach for upgrading cancer-on-a-chip systems. These hybrid platforms can create physiomimetic 3D models that better emulate tumor microenvironment elements and improve the predictability of therapeutics performance.
Combinatorial conjugation of organ-on-a-chip platforms with additive manufacturing technologies is rapidly emerging as a disruptive approach for upgrading cancer-on-a-chip systems towards anatomic-sized dynamic in vitro models. This valuable technological synergy has potential for giving rise to truly physiomimetic 3D models that better emulate tumor microenvironment elements, bioarchitecture, and response to multidimensional flow dynamics. Herein, we showcase the most recent advances in bioengineering 3D-bioprinted cancer-on-a-chip platforms and provide a comprehensive discussion on design guidelines and possibilities for high-throughput analysis. Such hybrid platforms represent a new generation of highly sophisticated 3D tumor models with improved biomimicry and predictability of therapeutics performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available