4.7 Article

Vehicle routing optimization for hazmat shipments considering catastrophe avoidance and failed edges

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102337

Keywords

Vehicle routing; Hazmat shipments; Catastrophe avoidance; Failed edges; 2-stage decision-making

Funding

  1. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [71732006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572138, 71371150, 71390331, 71871176]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M683519]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SK2020031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research presents a bi-objective vehicle routing optimization model for hazmat shipments considering catastrophe avoidance and failed edges. It introduces a 2-stage decision-making process with two different strategies developed for dealing with failed edges after incidents. Both strategies are compared using mathematical analysis, with numerical results reported and managerial insights provided through sensitivity analysis.
This research is a bi-objective vehicle routing optimization for hazmat shipments considering catastrophe avoidance and failed edges. The risk is defined as load dependent incident consequence, and the maximum risk is minimized based on the principle of catastrophe avoidance. A 2-stage decision-making is proposed to deal with the failed edges after incidents, and two different strategies are discussed. In each strategy, a bi-objective vehicle routing model is developed to decide the initial vehicle routing plan in the first decision-making stage, and a path selection model is developed to decide the paths of substitute vehicles in order to complete the unfinished deliveries of incident vehicles in the second decision-making stage. The exact algorithms and approximation algorithms are developed for both strategies. Whereafter, the two strategies are compared by mathematical analysis. Finally, numerical results are reported and the sensitivity analysis provides several managerial insights.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available