4.7 Article

Exact and hybrid heuristic methods to solve the combinatorial bid construction problem with stochastic prices in truckload transportation services procurement auctions

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 204-229

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.04.010

Keywords

Combinatorial auctions; Transportation procurement; Bid construction problem; Pricing; Stochastic prices; Simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper tackles the Bid Construction Problem in combinatorial auctions for transportation services, proposing an exact non-enumerative method for solving this NP Hard problem. Computational results show optimal solutions can be achieved for instances with up to 50 contracts, with a hybrid heuristic providing competitive solutions in a fraction of the run time. The exact method also demonstrates good performance across a set of simulated auction contexts.
In combinatorial auctions for the procurement of transportation services, each carrier has to determine the set of profitable contracts to bid on and the associated ask prices. This is known as the Bid Construction Problem (BCP). Our paper addresses a BCP with stochastic clearing prices taking into account uncertainty on other competing carriers' offers. Contracts' selection and pricing decisions are integrated to generate multiple combinatorial bids. Our paper is the first to propose an exact non-enumerative method to solve this NP Hard problem. Our computational results demonstrate that optimal solutions can be obtained on instances with up to 50 contracts. We also propose a hybrid heuristic that yields most of the these optimal solutions in a fraction of the run time, and provides competitive solutions for the remaining instances. Finally, our results show the good performance of our exact method for a set of auction contexts we simulate. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available