4.5 Article

Fatty liver disease in living liver donors: a single-institute experience of 220 donors

Journal

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 2238-2246

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tri.14005

Keywords

fatty liver disease; living donor liver transplantation; postoperative donor follow-up

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through a retrospective review of 220 living liver donors, it was found that male donors with a high BMI immediately before surgery and a history of treatment for preoperative fatty liver were more likely to develop postoperative fatty liver, which often showed refractoriness to weight loss intervention.
We retrospectively reviewed 220 living liver donors, with a focus on the development of postoperative fatty liver. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, imaging tests, operations and biopsies were obtained from medical records. We used unenhanced CT and USG to diagnose fatty liver. Donor candidates with fatty liver underwent weight loss intervention until imaging tests no longer demonstrated any features of fatty liver. Among 220 donors, 61 were diagnosed with preoperative fatty liver. The mean BMI of these 61 donors significantly decreased from 24.9 at the first visit to 23.6 kg/m(2) immediately before surgery (P = 0.0386). A multivariate analysis revealed the following significant risk factors for postoperative fatty liver: male sex (P = 0.0033), BMI immediately before surgery (P = 0.0028) and a history of treatment for preoperative fatty liver (P = 0.0231). Postoperative fatty liver was often refractory to weight loss intervention. No improvement was observed in 14 of the 32 donors who had been diagnosed with fatty liver postoperatively, and one of the 14 donors even developed NASH. In conclusion, special attention should be paid to prevent fatty liver after surgery in male donors who show a high BMI immediately before surgery and with a history of treatment for preoperative fatty liver, and lifelong follow-up is recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available