4.2 Review

Use of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 61, Issue 8, Pages 2503-2511

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/trf.16525

Keywords

FFP transfusion; transplantation-solid organ; transfusion practices (oncology-hematology)

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [PDF-532926-2019]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [5R35HL139854, F32HL154320, R01HL059842]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Convalescent plasma therapy may benefit COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression by improving mortality rate and clinical outcomes, but further investigation is needed.
In the absence of effective countermeasures, human convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the causative agent of novel coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), including among patients with innate or acquired immunosuppression. However, the association between COVID-19-associated mortality in patients with immunosuppression and therapeutic use of convalescent plasma is unknown. We review 75 reports, including one large matched-control registry study of 143 COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancies, and 51 case reports and 23 case series representing 238 COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression. We review clinical features and treatment protocols of COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression after treatment with human convalescent plasma. We also discuss the time course and clinical features of recovery. The available data from case reports and case series provide evidence suggesting a mortality benefit and rapid clinical improvement in patients with several forms of immunosuppression following COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion. The utility of convalescent plasma or other forms of antibody therapy in immune-deficient and immune-suppressed patients with COVID-19 warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available