4.7 Article

A new structural similitude method for laminated composite cylinders

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107920

Keywords

Laminated composite cylinder; Free vibration; Similitude theory; Scaled model; Similitude distortion; Energy similitude correction method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposes a new similitude method to correct the distortion caused by the non-scalability of ply thickness in laminated composite cylinders, aiming to establish high-precision similitude of their free vibration. The method is verified through numerical examples and shown to solve the similitude distortion with high accuracy, applicable to various cylinders with different ply thickness, stacking sequences, and materials.
Similitude theory has been applied to design scaled models in many fields of engineering. For laminated composite cylinders, the ply thickness is too thin to manufacture in scaled models, leading to similitude distortion. Meanwhile, this distortion problem cannot be solved with the traditional similitude method. The present study aims to propose a new similitude method to correct the distortion caused by non-scalability of ply thickness and to establish high-precision similitude of the free vibration of laminated composite cylinders. Firstly, the complete and partial similitude relationships are deduced while the similitude distortion derived from the non-scalability of ply thickness is discussed. Then, with the analysis of similitude for energy, a new similitude method named the energy similitude correction method is proposed. Finally, this method is verified through numerical examples of various cylinders. The results show that the proposed method can solve the similitude distortion of ply thickness with high accuracy, and it can be applied to various cylinders with different ply thickness, stacking sequences and materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available