4.4 Editorial Material

Reply to: Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: more questions than answers

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Letter Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: more questions than answers

S. Di Saverio et al.

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: A case matched study

Jingwang Ye et al.

Summary: This study compared the clinicopathological and mid-term oncological outcomes of TaTME and LaTME for mid and low rectal cancer. The results showed no significant differences in postoperative complications and survival rates between the two groups, indicating that TaTME is a feasible and safe alternative to laparoscopic surgery in a high volume center.
Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision

M. X. Bjorn et al.

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY (2020)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision

N. S. Fearnhead et al.

COLORECTAL DISEASE (2020)

Article Surgery

St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision

Michel Adamina et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2018)

Article Surgery

COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer

Charlotte L. Deijen et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2016)