4.0 Article

Cheilanthes ecuadorensis: A New Species of Cheilanthes s. s. (Pteridaceae) from Northern South America

Journal

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 249-259

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT TAXONOMISTS
DOI: 10.1600/036364421X16231782047280

Keywords

Cheilanthoid ferns; cytogenetics; geographical distribution; spore number per sporangium

Funding

  1. NSF Systematic Biology and Biodiversity Inventory [DEB-0717398, DEB-0717430]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ongoing research has led to the discovery of a new species, Cheilanthes ecuadorensis, from the taxonomically complex genus Cheilanthes in Ecuador. Despite its superficial similarity to C. pilosa, molecular analysis shows that C. ecuadorensis is actually more closely related to C. micropteris. This study underscores the significance of herbaria in the process of discovering new species.
Ongoing research on the taxonomically complex genus Cheilanthes (Pteridaceae; Cheilanthoideae) has resulted in the identification of a new species from Loja Province in Ecuador, Cheilanthes ecuadorensis, described and illustrated herein. Originally collected in 1988 and identified as C. cf. rufopunctata, C. ecuadorensis is clearly distinct from that species in having pubescent adaxial blade surfaces and narrow, poorlydifferentiated false indusia (rather than the glabrous adaxial surfaces and wide false indusia of C. rufopunctata). Among the South American species currently included in Cheilanthes, C. ecuadorensis is superficially most similar to C. pilosa. However, our molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate that C. ecuadorensis is sister to C. micropteris, the morphologically disparate generitype of Cheilanthes. Here we examine the phylogenetic relationships, morphology, cytogenetics, and geography of these four South American Cheilanthes species in a study that, once again, highlights the importance of herbaria in the process of new species discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available