Journal
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 2163-2169Publisher
SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-01024-8
Keywords
Wildland fire; Wildland-urban interface; Polycentric governance; Firewise; Homeowners insurance
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Climate change, demographic shifts, and insurance issues are leading to an expansion of high-intensity wildfire risk areas in the United States, increasing the burden on property owners living in these regions. Polycentric governance institutions can help make wildfire mitigation more equitable and ensure responsibility for fireproofing is shared.
Climate change, drought, forest pest infestations, and pathogens, and high fuel loadings all factor into the expansion of territory in the United States deemed high-risk for high-intensity wildfire. Risks also mount as a decades-long demographic shift plays out, with individuals and families relocating from urban centers to more sparsely populated, vegetated areas on the margins of cities and towns-a trend that accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. As some insurance carriers cease underwriting homeowners insurance in wildfire-prone areas, property owners can be expected to shoulder more costs for home hardening. The equity implications of who pays to fireproof homes and neighborhoods will intensify as wildfire risks multiply in areas beyond the comparatively wealthier wildland-urban interfaces (WUI) of the Pacific coastal states. Systems of polycentric governance, consisting of problem-solving actors who collaborate across jurisdictional and geographical boundaries, can help make wildfire mitigation more equitable. Polycentric governance institutions already help communities adapt to destructive wildfire in the United States. Lessons learned from these institutions must be tailored to poor and marginalized communities in harm's way-with a sense of urgency.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available