4.6 Article

Comparison of laparoscopic surgery with open standard surgery for advanced gastric carcinoma in a single institute: a propensity score matching analysis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08652-2

Keywords

Advanced gastric cancer; Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Elderly; Propensity score matching

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology of Japan [16K10525]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K10525] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In comparison with open standard gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy did not result in inferior disease-free survival for both early-stage and locally advanced gastric cancer patients. The study showed no significant difference in mortality and morbidity between the two surgical methods, but the benefits of 5-year relapse-free survival were larger in elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy compared to nonelderly patients.
Background Compared with open standard gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) did not result in inferior disease-free survival for early-stage and locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, whether LG for AGC in elderly patients is more beneficial than OG is unclear. Methods This study examined 458 patients with AGC. The mortality, morbidity, and prognosis were compared by age, gender, T and N factors, and pathological stage in the LG and OG groups using propensity score matching analysis. For the final analysis, 151 pairs of patients were selected from at each group. Results The results showed that no significant difference in mortality and morbidity existed between the two groups. The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 70% and 62% in the LG and OG groups, respectively (p = 0.104). The 5-year RFS rates in patients with pathological stages I, II, and III who had undergone LG were 84%, 80%, and 55%, respectively, and 78%, 70%, and 45%, respectively, in those who had undergone OG (p < 0.005). The 5-year RFS rates in nonelderly patients who underwent LG or OG were 75% and 68%, respectively, and 58% and 40%, respectively, in elderly patients who underwent LG or OG (p < 0.005). Conclusion The 5-year RFS rates in patients with AGC at each stage did not significantly differ between LG and OG. However, the benefits at 5-year RFS in patients who underwent LG compared with OG were larger in elderly patients than those in nonelderly patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available