4.3 Article

Systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic marker for distal cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

SURGERY TODAY
Volume 51, Issue 10, Pages 1602-1609

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02312-7

Keywords

PLR; NLR; Systemic immune-inflammation index; Distal cholangiocarcinoma; Pancreatoduodenectomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) may be a useful prognostic marker for predicting the long-term survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Patients with high SII levels (SII >= 1450) were independently associated with poor survival outcomes, along with other factors such as portal vein resection and microscopic venous invasion.
Purpose The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a new marker, defined as the platelet count x neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. This study evaluates the SII as a prognostic marker for the overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). Methods One hundred and forty patients who underwent PD for DCC between September, 2002 and December, 2015 at our hospital were divided into a low SII (SII < 1450) group and a high SII (SII >= 1450) group. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and OS of the two groups retrospectively and used multivariate analyses to identify the prognostic factors for OS. Results The low and high SII groups comprised 119 and 21 patients, respectively. OS was better in the low SII group than in the high SII group, with median survival times of 81 and 26 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that portal vein resection (hazard ratio [HR], 9.58; p < 0.001), SII >= 1450 (HR, 2.05; p = 0.041), microscopic venous invasion (HR, 2.04; p = 0.005), and pN1 (HR, 1.73; p = 0.034) were independently associated with poor survival. Conclusion The SII may be useful for predicting the long-term survival of patients with DCC after PD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available