4.7 Article

Surface integrity and wear behavior of 300M steel subjected to ultrasonic surface rolling process

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 421, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127380

Keywords

Ultrasonic surface rolling process; 300M steel; Surface integrity; Wear resistance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1937208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influences of ultrasonic surface rolling process (USRP) on the surface integrity and wear resistance of 300M steel samples were comprehensively studied. Results indicated that a 10-pass USRP treatment can significantly improve the surface integrity and enhance the wear resistance of 300M steel by about 30.9%. However, the improvements tend to be saturated along with the increase of processing passes.
In this work, the influences of ultrasonic surface rolling process (USRP) on the surface integrity and wear resistance of 300M steel samples were comprehensively studied. The effects of processing pass on the surface integrity were analyzed in term of surface topography, surface roughness (Ra), superficial microstructure, microhardness, and residual stresses. The results indicated that 10-pass USRP treatment can generate a highly smooth surface with Ra approximate to 7 nm. Nanocrystalline and ultrafine crystalline structures were produced in the surface layer. Significant compressive residual stress with a maximum value of about -950 MPa and a depth of about 800 mu m was introduced into the sample surface. The comprehensive effects of grain refinement, work hardening, and compressive residual stress improved the surface hardness by about 30.9%, which obviously enhanced the wear resistance of 300M steel. It is noteworthy that the improvements of surface integrity and wear resistance of 300M steel brought about by USRP tend to be saturated along with the increase of processing passes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available