4.1 Review

Intervention Stigma toward Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Review

Journal

SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE
Volume 56, Issue 14, Pages 2181-2201

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1975749

Keywords

Stigma; medications for addiction treatment; pharmacotherapy; opioid use disorder; methadone; buprenorphine

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [2018-46100-28782]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic review on prejudice and discrimination toward medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), highlighting how intervention stigma influences healthcare providers, peer patients, and the general public's perceptions of methadone and buprenorphine. It also points out the need for further research on reducing intervention stigma toward MOUD to improve access to care and reduce patient barriers.
Introduction Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are evidence-based treatments, yet can be controversial among some populations. This study provides a systematic review of prejudice and discrimination toward MOUD, a form of intervention stigma, or stigma associated with a particular medical treatment. Methods A systematic search strategy was used in PsychInfo and PubMed to identify studies published between 1998 and 2018. Studies that empirically examined stigma toward MOUD were included if the manuscript was of moderate or high quality. Studies were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Results The search yielded 972 studies, of which 28 were included. Most studies utilized qualitative methods to examine intervention stigma toward methadone or buprenorphine, with one including naltrexone. Studies demonstrated that intervention stigma among healthcare providers was influenced by lack of training and abstinent treatment preferences. Providers equated MOUD with illicit substance use and at times refused to care for MOUD patients. Stigma among peer patients seeking treatment was also influenced by abstinent treatment preferences, and among the general public stigma was influenced by lack of MOUD knowledge. Intervention stigma was also driven at the policy level by high regulation of methadone, which fueled diversion and hindered social functioning among patients. Few studies indicated how to reduce intervention stigma toward MOUD. Conclusions Intervention stigma affects both provision and perceptions of methadone and buprenorphine, decreasing access and utilization of MOUD. Future research should further develop and test MOUD stigma reduction interventions in a variety of social contexts to improve access to care and reduce patient barriers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available