4.7 Article

Structural basis for accommodation of emerging B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 variants by two potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 655-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.05.014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH Common Fund Transformative High Resolution Cryo-Electron Microscopy program [U24 GM129539]
  2. Simons Foundation [SF349247]
  3. NY State Assembly
  4. Intramural Program of the Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH
  5. Brii Bioscieces
  6. Jack Ma Foundation
  7. JBP Foundation
  8. NIH [DP5OD023118, R21AI143407, R21AI144408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants pose clinical concerns due to reduced neutralization by certain antibodies, but antibodies targeting specific regions may still be effective in bypassing mutations and providing potential therapeutic benefits.
Emerging SARS-CoV-2 strains, B. 1.1.7 and B.1.351, from the UK and South Africa, respectively, show decreased neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and convalescent or vaccinee sera raised against the original wild-type virus, and are thus of clinical concern. However, the neutralization potency of two antibodies, 1-57 and 2-7, which target the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike, was unaffected by these emerging strains. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of 1-57 and 2-7 in complex with spike, revealing each of these antibodies to utilize a distinct mechanism to bypass or accommodate RBD mutations. Notably, each antibody represented an immune response with recognition distinct from those of frequent antibody classes. Moreover, many epitope residues recognized by 1-57 and 2-7 were outside hotspots of evolutionary pressure for ACE2 binding and neutralizing antibody escape. We suggest the therapeutic use of antibodies, such as 1-57 and 2-7, which target less prevalent epitopes, could ameliorate issues of monoclonal antibody escape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available