4.7 Article

Inherent backbone dynamics fine-tune the functional plasticity of Tudor domains

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 1253-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.06.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2016-04721]
  2. Knut och Alice Wallenberg Foundation through a Wallenberg Academy Fellowship [2016.0163]
  3. Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  4. NIH [P41GM111135]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2016-04721] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used solution NMR spectroscopy to analyze the dynamical properties of Tudor domains from four different bacterial proteins, revealing subtle differences in motions on different timescales and the importance of these dynamics in discerning domain functionalities.
Tudor domains are crucial for mediating a diversity of protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions involved in nucleic acid metabolism. Using solution NMR spectroscopy, we assess the comprehensive understanding of the dynamical properties of the respective Tudor domains from four different bacterial (Escherichia coli) proteins UvrD, Mfd, RfaH, and NusG involved in different aspects of bacterial transcription regulation and associated processes. These proteins are benchmarked to the canonical Tudor domain fold from the human SMN protein. The detailed analysis of protein backbone dynamics and subsequent analysis by the Lipari-Szabo model-free approach revealed subtle differences in motions of the amide-bond vector on both pico-to nanosecond and micro-to millisecond timescales. On these timescales, our comparative approach reveals the usefulness of discrete amplitudes of dynamics to discern the different functionalities for Tudor domains exhibiting promiscuous binding, including the metamorphic Tudor domain included in the study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available