4.4 Article

Bayesian Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling: An Investigation into Robust Prior Distributions for the Doubly Latent Categorical Model

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2021.1915146

Keywords

Bayesian; robust priors; multilevel models

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [406-15-264]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bayesian estimation of multilevel structural equation models has advantages in terms of sample size requirements and computational feasibility, but careful specification of the prior distribution, especially for random effects variance parameters, is necessary. The paper investigates alternative, more robust prior distributions for the doubly latent categorical multilevel model, highlighting the importance of constructing reasonable priors for multiple random effects variance parameters in MLSEMs. Although the robust priors outperform the traditional inverse-Gamma prior, consideration of hyperparameters is still crucial.
Bayesian estimation of multilevel structural equation models (MLSEMs) offers advantages in terms of sample size requirements and computational feasibility, but does require careful specification of the prior distribution especially for the random effects variance parameters. The traditional non-informative conjugate choice of an inverse-Gamma prior with small hyperparameters has been shown time and again to be problematic. In this paper, we investigate alternative, more robust prior distributions for the doubly latent categorical multilevel model. In contrast to multilevel models without latent variables, MLSEMs have multiple random effects variance parameters both for the multilevel structure and for the latent variable structure. It is therefore even more important to construct reasonable priors for these parameters. We find that, although the robust priors outperform the traditional inverse-Gamma prior, their hyperparameters do require careful consideration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available