4.7 Article

Design of an aircraft engine bracket using stress-constrained bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method

Journal

STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 4147-4159

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-03040-9

Keywords

Engine bracket; BESO; Topology optimization; Stress constraint

Funding

  1. National Key RD Project [2020YFB1709401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972166]
  3. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei province of China [2020CFA080]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019kfyXKJC044]
  5. Aeronautics Power Foundation [6141B090564]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China [2021JM-043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work improves a previous stress-constrained topology optimization method and applies it to a typical aircraft engine bracket design problem. The improved method uses a more efficient and versatile self-adaptive scheme for determining the Lagrange multiplier, resulting in a bracket design that outperforms the original in terms of weight, stiffness, and strength.
This work improves our previous stress-constrained topology optimization method (Fan et al., in Struct Multidisc Optim 59:647-658, 2019) and provides an application of the improved method to a typical aircraft engine bracket design problem. The original method was built upon the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method with an extension to account for stress constraints. In this work, we first improve the method by means of a more efficient and versatile self-adaptive scheme for the determination of the Lagrange multiplier. The improved method is then applied for the design of a typical aircraft engine bracket considering multiple practical load conditions. The resulting bracket topology from stress-constrained design is further smoothed and detailed using basic CAD (Computer-Aided Design) primitives. Numerical results show that the reconstructed bracket design evidently outperforms than the original bracket design in terms of weight, stiffness, and strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available