4.5 Article

Subgroup discovery in non-inferiority trials

Journal

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 24, Pages 5174-5187

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9118

Keywords

non-inferiority trials; random forests; regression trees; subgroup analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5UL1TR002556]
  2. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [AD-1402-10857]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined approaches and guidelines for subgroup analysis to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect in clinical trials, with a focus on non-inferiority (NI) trials. It found that standard statistical tests and machine learning methods have different applications and performances in subgroup analysis, helping to understand the underlying reasons for trial outcomes.
Approaches and guidelines for performing subgroup analysis to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect in clinical trials have been the topic of numerous papers in the statistical and clinical literature, but have been discussed predominantly in the context of conventional superiority trials. Concerns about treatment heterogeneity are the same if not greater in non-inferiority (NI) trials, especially since overall similarity between two treatment arms in a successful NI trial could be due to the existence of qualitative interactions that are more likely when comparing two active therapies. Even in unsuccessful NI trials, subgroup analyses can yield important insights about the potential reasons for failure to demonstrate non-inferiority of the experimental therapy. Recent NI trials have performed a priori subgroup analyses using standard statistical tests for interaction, but there is increasing interest in more flexible machine learning approaches for post-hoc subgroup discovery. The performance and practical application of such methods in NI trials have not been systematically explored, however. We considered the Virtual Twin method for the NI setting, an algorithm for subgroup identification that combines random forest with classification and regression trees, and conducted extensive simulation studies to examine its performance under different NI trial conditions and to devise decision rules for selecting the final subgroups. We illustrate the utility of the method with data from a NI trial that was conducted to compare two acupuncture treatments for chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available