4.3 Article

Physicochemical Properties and the Digestibility of Cassava Root and Stem Starches Associated with Genotypes

Journal

STARCH-STARKE
Volume 74, Issue 1-2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.202100030

Keywords

crop residues; degree of swelling; digestibility; freeze-thaw stability; principal component analysis

Funding

  1. Guangxi University [T3310097103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The physicochemical traits of cassava stem and root starches differ, with potential for various industrial applications. Root starch exhibits superior texture and stability compared to stem starch, with no significant difference in starch content. Genotypes GW46, GW88, S1, E26, and GC49 score higher in multiple traits, making them suitable for cultivation by Chinese farmers.
Cassava stems contain up to 40% starch (by dry mass) and are currently discarded as agricultural waste. The current study aims to understand the physicochemical traits of cassava stem and root starches for investigating trends in industrial cassava applications. In total, 11 traits of both cassava stem and root starches of 15 genotypes are investigated. All the examined traits of cassava root and stem starches vary by genotype. The amylose contents of root and stem starches are in the range of 19.0-33.0% and 18.44-34.51%, respectively. The resistant starch of root and stem starches are in the range of 1.72-17.72% and 4.42-13.37%, respectively. Only the starch content, solubility, and swelling power of root starches are significantly higher than those of stem starches. The root starch gel is more stable than the stem starch gel after the fourth and fifth freeze-thaw cycles. Furthermore, principal component analysis calculated based on starch and amylose contents, degree of swelling, digestibility, and freeze-thaw stability demonstrates that genotypes GW46, GW88, S1, E26, and GC49 gain higher scores than control varieties South China 12 and South China 205, which are the most favorable ones by farmers in China because of good root yields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available