4.5 Article

No Difference in Reoperation Rates for Adjacent Segment Disease (Operative Adjacent Segment Disease) in Posterior Cervical Fusions Stopping at C7 Versus T1/T2 A Cohort of 875 Patients-Part 1

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Clinical Neurology

Is it safe to stop at C7 during multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion? - multicenter analysis

Eeric Truumees et al.

Summary: This study compared the outcomes of three or more level posterior cervical fusions ending in the cervical spine versus those extended into the thoracic spine. The results showed no significant differences in revision rates, patient reported outcomes, or radiographic outcomes between the two groups. Furthermore, the study suggests that extending posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may not be necessary for most patients.

SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Article Clinical Neurology

Analysis of adjacent-segment cervical kinematics: the role of construct length and the dorsal ligamentous complex

Daniel Lubelski et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Risk factors associated with reoperation in posterior cervical fusions: A large-scale retrospective analysis

Royce W. Woodro et al.

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction

Ivan Cheng et al.

GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL (2015)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Confounder selection in environmental epidemiology: Assessment of health effects of prenatal mercury exposure

Esben Budtz-Jorgensen et al.

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)

Article Clinical Neurology

The cervicothoracic junction

Vincent Y. Wang et al.

NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2007)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Ethnic disparities in diabetic complications in an insured population

AJ Karter et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)