4.5 Review

Adaptive management in restoration initiatives: Lessons learned from some of South Africa's projects

Journal

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 352-361

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2021.03.016

Keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Climate change mitigation and adaptation; Ecosystem services; Livelihoods; Sustainability

Categories

Funding

  1. eThekwini Municipality through the Durban Research Action Partnership: Community Reforestation Research Programme
  2. South African Research Chair's Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  3. National Research Foundation of South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed three woodland restoration initiatives in South Africa and found their limited emphasis on sustainable livelihood driven outcomes, mainly focusing on restoring biodiversity, ecosystem infrastructure, and ecosystem services. A modified livelihood framework was proposed, emphasizing a more inclusive approach towards achieving positive human outcome-driven restoration of degraded woodlands. Restoration initiatives should invest in ecosystem restoration in the context of sustainable development goals, to enhance people's livelihoods, and address climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Land use change, coupled with rapid human population growth, has increased ecosystem degradation, giving rise to ecosystem restoration initiatives worldwide. We conducted an assessment and reflection using a feedback framework for strategic adaptive management in three woodland restoration initiatives in South Africa. This is because assessment and reflection are critical components for successful strategic adaptive management. We found that the three restoration initiatives have had a limited emphasis on sustainable livelihood driven outcomes, because the initiatives mainly aimed to restore biodiversity, ecosystem infrastructure and ecosystem services. Consequently, we propose a modified livelihood framework that suggests a more inclusive approach towards achieving positive human outcome-driven restoration of degraded woodlands. Based on the framework, we emphasise that restoration initiatives should seek to invest in ecosystem restoration in the context of sustainable development goals, to enhance people's livelihoods, and climate change mitigation and adaptation. Harmonizing the competing needs for resource allocation, sustainable interventions and livelihoods sustenance will be important, given the limited extent of alternative locally based livelihood options in the rural disadvantaged areas. This is because most of the rural population is largely dependent on woodland ecosystem services for their livelihoods. We then suggest that to ensure that human-driven outcomes are also equally prioritised; the assessment, reflection and feedback framework and the livelihoods framework should form part of restoration initiatives. (c) 2021 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available