4.8 Article

Detection of Hot-Spot Mutations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA From Patients With Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 151, Issue 2, Pages 267-270

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.034

Keywords

Genetic; Biomarker; Prognostic Factor; Diagnostic; IPMN; PDAC

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [K.L. 2544/1-1, K.L. 2544/1-2]
  2. Forschungskern SyStaR
  3. BIU (Bohringer Ingelheim Ulm)
  4. Else-Kroner-Fresenius-Stiftung [2011_A200]
  5. German Cancer Aid Max Eder Fellowship
  6. German Cancer Aid Grant [111879]
  7. Fritz-Thyssen Foundation [2015-00363]
  8. Hector Foundation Cancer Research Fund
  9. Baden-Wurttemberg Stiftung
  10. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF Aachen), RWTH Aachen University Medical School, Aachen, Germany
  11. BMBF [01GS08114, 01ZX1305C, 01KT1506]
  12. Heidelberger Stiftung Chirurgie
  13. Biomaterial Bank Heidelberg (BMBF) [01EY1101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are the most frequent cystic pancreatic tumors. Little is known about their molecular alterations, but mutations in GNAS have been reported to promote IPMN formation. A tumor-derived fraction of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), isolated from blood samples, contains many of the same mutations as the primary tumor, and could be a tool for noninvasive disease monitoring. We found that the total amount of cfDNA can discriminate between individuals without pancreatic lesions (controls) and patients with Fukuoka-negative branch-duct IPMN or pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we detected GNAS mutations in cfDNA from patients with IPMN, but not in patients with serous cystadenoma or controls. Analyses of cfDNA might therefore be used in the diagnosis of patients with IPMN or in monitoring disease progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available