4.7 Article

Highly efficient long thin-film fiber-shaped dye sensitized solar cells based on a fully organic sensitizer

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.110986

Keywords

Dye sensitized solar cells; Long fiber-shaped solar cells; Thin film photoanode; Organic dye

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focused on optimizing key parameters of FDSSCs, designing long and flexible FDSSCs using TiO2 and TTZ5 as main materials, and achieving excellent photovoltaic performance.
In light of the ever-growing demand of modern electronics for wearable integrated optoelectronic devices, Fibershaped Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (FDSSCs) have gained increasing interest over the last years as suitable energy production systems for the development of the next generation of smart products. To fulfill the wearable concept, it is important to design long and flexible thin-film FDSSCs capable of adapting to curved surfaces such as the human body. In this study, for the first time, several key parameters towards the optimization of long and flexible FDSSCs based on inexpensive TiO2 as photoanode material and a fully organic thiazolo [5,4-d]thiazole-based sensitizer (TTZ5) were studied. First, the influence of photoanode thickness on photovoltaic performance was evaluated in 3.5 cm-long devices, for which an optimal thickness of 10 mu m was identified, obtaining a maximum PCE of 1.57 +/- 0.15%. Long (10 cm) complete FDSSCs were then fabricated, using thin layer photoanodes of about 5 mu m which were instead found to be the optimal choice for such devices. The as-obtained FDSSCs based on TTZ5 possess dimensions appealing for future applications while also delivering a remarkable PCE of 1.23 +/- 0.04%, thus paving the way for further optimization of thin-film flexible long FDSSCs based on organic sensitizers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available