4.6 Article

Materials and structures engineering of sun-light absorbers for efficient direct solar steam generation

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 225, Issue -, Pages 747-772

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.07.046

Keywords

Solar steam generation; Light absorber; Nanoparticles; Plasmonic; Carbon based absorbers; Water evaporation

Categories

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)
  2. research department of Tarbiat Modares University [IG-39710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water desalination through steam generation using solar energy is a low-cost and easy-to-use technology that utilizes a free source of energy. This study focuses on the direct method, reviewing the materials, mechanisms, and structures used for desalinating water through steam production by solar energy. By tuning the material, structure, and design of absorbers, challenges related to system performance and cost effectiveness have been overcome, providing insights for future development of such structures.
Water desalination through steam generation using solar energy not only is a low cost and facile technology but also uses a free source of energy. This technology is performed through two direct and indirect methods. This work focuses on the direct one where the materials, mechanisms, and structures used for desalinating water through the production of steam by solar energy are reviewed. Since the light absorber is the heart of the system, all absorber types with a variety of structures including graphene, graphite, carbon, carbon nanotube (CNT), carbonized wood, plants, polymers, and plasmonic nanoparticles are studied. It is shown that how the material, structure, and design of the absorbers have been tuned to overcome the challenges regarding the performance and cost effectiveness of these systems, leading to propos the perspective on future development of this structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available