4.7 Article

Manuring effects on visual soil quality indicators and soil organic matter content in different pedoclimatic zones in Europe and China

Journal

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105033

Keywords

Visual soil assessment; Visual soil quality indicators; Organic matter amendment; Soil structure; Soil organic carbon; Labile organic carbon

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Program for research innovation [635750]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFE011270]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [16146KYSB20150001]
  4. Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation [15.0170-1]
  5. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [635750] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the differences between soils receiving organic matter (OM) amendments and control soils by using the visual soil assessment method. The results showed that the OM group had significantly better scores for soil structure and consistency, as well as soil porosity. The correlations between visual soil quality indicators and climate variables followed similar directions as the correlations between LOC content and the same climate variables, though weak.
A study was carried out to assess if the visual soil assessment method (VSA) would allow recognizing differences between soils receiving organic matter (OM) amendments and similar control soils, by the observation of visual soil quality indicators' score. 36 practices were identified across 8 pedoclimatic zones. These fields/plots were paired with nearby control fields/plots, without OM amendments, sharing similar farming features. A survey, comprising a VSA of the soil structure status, surface ponding, signs of erosion, earthworm counts and soil stability (slake test), complemented by measurements of soil organic matter (SOM) and permanganate oxidizable organic carbon (LOC) content, soil pH, penetration resistance and texture, on soils of both management system groups (OM addition and Control), was performed in 2016. Correlations of the visual soil quality indicators' score with SOM, LOC, other soil properties and climate variables and indices were calculated within each group; the correlations between soil properties, and between soil properties (SOM and LOC) and climate variables were also calculated. A statistically significantly higher proportion of soils of the OM group had a good score for soil structure and consistency and soil porosity. These differences are not directly explained by non-inherent soil properties. No statistically significant Spearman's correlation coefficients were observed between soil structure and consistency and either soil properties or climate variables; concerning soil porosity, distinct statistically significant correlations were observed between the two groups with different climate variables and indices. Correlations between the scores of the visual soil quality indicators and climate variables were found to follow the same directions of correlations of LOC content with the same climate variables, although the latter correlations were weak. Mean SOM and LOC content, were slightly higher in the OM group, although differences were not statistically significant. A high linear correlation between LOC (mg/g) and SOM (%) (r = 0.65, n = 26) exists within the Control group, but not within the OM group (r = 0.20 and n = 26). When the relationship of SOM and LOC content with visual soil quality indicators' score was studied, statistically significant correlations were only observed between SOM and earthworm count within the Control group (r(s) = 0.44), and between LOC and soil colour within the OM group (r(s)=-0.52). Both LOC content and LOC status (ranked as a function of LOC content and soil texture), had only negative statistically significant correlations with visual soil quality indicators' score, questioning their worth as stand-alone soil quality indicators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available