4.5 Article

Emotion depends on context, culture and their interaction: evidence from effective connectivity

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 206-217

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab092

Keywords

effective connectivity; Granger causality; EEG; emotion; culture; context

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [NSF BCS-1551688]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used Granger causality analysis to examine the influence of cultural background and situation on emotions. The results showed that mainland Chinese participants have a different neural representation of fear compared to US participants, with a greater emphasis on the social aspects of scenes.
Situated models of emotion hypothesize that emotions are optimized for the context at hand, but most neuroimaging approaches ignore context. For the first time, we applied Granger causality (GC) analysis to determine how an emotion is affected by a person's cultural background and situation. Electroencephalographic recordings were obtained from mainland Chinese (CHN) and US participants as they viewed and rated fearful and neutral images displaying either social or non-social contexts. Independent component analysis and GC analysis were applied to determine the epoch of peak effect for each condition and to identify sources and sinks among brain regions of interest. We found that source-sink couplings differed across culture, situation and culture x situation. Mainland CHN participants alone showed preference for an early-onset source-sink pairing with the supramarginal gyrus as a causal source, suggesting that, relative to US participants, CHN participants more strongly prioritized a scene's social aspects in their response to fearful scenes. Our findings suggest that the neural representation of fear indeed varies according to both culture and situation and their interaction in ways that are consistent with norms instilled by cultural background.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available