4.5 Article

Confirmation of interpersonal expectations is intrinsically rewarding

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 1276-1287

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab081

Keywords

stereotypes; reward; fMRI; NAcc; value; consistency

Funding

  1. Israeli Science Foundation [79/18]
  2. Yad Ha'Nadiv (Rothschild) Foundation
  3. Mind, Brain and Behavior interfaculty program at Harvard University
  4. National Institutes of Health Shared Instrumentation Grant Program [S10OD020039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research shows that people use stereotypes and prior knowledge to predict others' responses in interpersonal communication. The study found that when perceivers observe information consistent with their social expectations, brain regions associated with reward processing are activated, and perceivers are willing to forgo money to achieve their expectations.
People want to interact successfully with other individuals, and they invest significant efforts in attempting to do so. Decades of research have demonstrated that to simplify the dauntingly complex task of interpersonal communication, perceivers predict the responses of individuals in their environment using stereotypes and other sources of prior knowledge. Here, we show that these top-down expectations can also shape the subjective value of expectation-consistent and expectationviolating targets. Specifically, in two neuroimaging experiments (n= 58), we observed increased activation in brain regions associated with reward processing-including the nucleus accumbens-when perceivers observed information consistent with their social expectations. In two additional behavioral experiments (n= 704), we observed that perceivers were willing to forgo money to encounter an expectation-consistent target and avoid an expectation-violating target. Together, these findings suggest that perceivers value having their social expectations confirmed, much like food or monetary rewards.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available