4.6 Article

Knee energy harvester with variable transmission to reduce the effect on the walking gait

Journal

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/ac0bfe

Keywords

energy harvester; human motion; variable radius drum; cable-driven; variable transmission

Funding

  1. Innovation and Technology Commission [ITS/367/18]
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CUHK 14210019]
  3. Hong Kong Centre for Logistics Robotics of InnoHK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A lightweight human knee energy harvester has been developed to capture energy from knee motion, employing a variable radius drum-cable mechanism to reduce its impact on gait. Experimental results show minimal changes in users' walking gait when using the harvester, with no statistically significant difference in metabolic cost compared to normal walking.
Harvesting energy from human motions is a promising solution to the power issue for wearable electronics. Recently, various energy harvesters were developed to capture the motion of the lower limbs such as the rotary motion of the knee and ankle joints to generate electricity. However, these devices would increase the users' burden for walking and at the same time alter the users' walking gait. It may also induce potential harm to the users' bodies. In this paper, we develop a lightweight human knee energy harvester to capture energy from the knee motion. To reduce the effect of the harvester on the users' gaits, a variable radius drum-cable mechanism with variable transmission ratio is employed to allow the generated torque to match the torque of the human knee joint. Experimental results indicate that when walking with the harvester, the changes to the users' walking gait are small, compared with normal gait. The Pearson's coefficient and root mean square error between the angle curves of the knee joint when walking with and without the device are over 0.96 and less than 5.96 degrees, respectively. Metabolic cost testing shows no statistically significant difference between harvesting and normal walking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available