4.7 Article

Comparing hydrate-based method with freezing/thawing method for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal close to the melting point of ice

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 266, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118523

Keywords

Heavy metal; Hydrate; Freeze; Separation; Waste water; Removal

Funding

  1. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019JJ50567]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation Outstanding Youth Fund of China [2020JJ3030]
  3. National university student innovation and entrepreneurship training programs of China [202010545006]
  4. Scientific research project of Xiangnan University [2019XJ15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, freezing/thawing method and hydrate-based method were compared for the removal of chromium hydroxide sulfate near the melting point of ice. The freezing/thawing method showed higher efficiency and was recommended for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal when the concentration was below 800 ppm.
In this work, both freezing/thawing method and hydrate-based method for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal with the temperature closing to melting point of ice have been conducted and compared in consideration of stirring speed, freezing time (or hydration-time), temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration. The results suggested that chromium hydroxide sulfate removal efficiency of 93.9% was optimal with 85.6% of yield of melted water for freezing/thawing method. However, optimal chromium hydroxide sulfate removal efficiency and yield of melted water was 71.2% and 53.4% for hydrate-based method respectively. The optimal temperature for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal was different between the freezing/thawing method and the hydrate-based method. The optimal stirring speed freezing time, temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration for freezing/thawing method were 800 r/min, 3 h, 271.6 K, and 100 ppm, respectively. However, the optimal stirring speed, hydration time, temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration for hydrate-based method were 400 r/min, 1 h, 271.1 K, and 100 ppm, respectively. The results also suggested that the freezing/thawing method seems to be more effective than the hydrate-based method at 5.50 MPa for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal at the same temperature in this work. Therefore, the freezing/ thawing method should be the first choice to remove chromium hydroxide sulfate at the temperature ranged from 269.2 K to 271.2 K when the concentration of chromium hydroxide sulfate was less than 800 ppm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available