Journal
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 266, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118523
Keywords
Heavy metal; Hydrate; Freeze; Separation; Waste water; Removal
Categories
Funding
- Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019JJ50567]
- Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation Outstanding Youth Fund of China [2020JJ3030]
- National university student innovation and entrepreneurship training programs of China [202010545006]
- Scientific research project of Xiangnan University [2019XJ15]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study, freezing/thawing method and hydrate-based method were compared for the removal of chromium hydroxide sulfate near the melting point of ice. The freezing/thawing method showed higher efficiency and was recommended for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal when the concentration was below 800 ppm.
In this work, both freezing/thawing method and hydrate-based method for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal with the temperature closing to melting point of ice have been conducted and compared in consideration of stirring speed, freezing time (or hydration-time), temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration. The results suggested that chromium hydroxide sulfate removal efficiency of 93.9% was optimal with 85.6% of yield of melted water for freezing/thawing method. However, optimal chromium hydroxide sulfate removal efficiency and yield of melted water was 71.2% and 53.4% for hydrate-based method respectively. The optimal temperature for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal was different between the freezing/thawing method and the hydrate-based method. The optimal stirring speed freezing time, temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration for freezing/thawing method were 800 r/min, 3 h, 271.6 K, and 100 ppm, respectively. However, the optimal stirring speed, hydration time, temperature, and chromium hydroxide sulfate concentration for hydrate-based method were 400 r/min, 1 h, 271.1 K, and 100 ppm, respectively. The results also suggested that the freezing/thawing method seems to be more effective than the hydrate-based method at 5.50 MPa for chromium hydroxide sulfate removal at the same temperature in this work. Therefore, the freezing/ thawing method should be the first choice to remove chromium hydroxide sulfate at the temperature ranged from 269.2 K to 271.2 K when the concentration of chromium hydroxide sulfate was less than 800 ppm.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available