4.7 Article

Optimal design of an MDEA CO2 capture plant for low-carbon hydrogen production - A rigorous process optimization approach

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119715

Keywords

CO2 capture with MDEA; Low-carbon H-2 production with CO2 capture; Energy consumption minimization; Process optimization

Funding

  1. project Elegancy. ACT ELEGANCY [271498]
  2. DETEC (CH)
  3. BMWi (DE)
  4. RVO (NL)
  5. Gassnova (NO)
  6. BEIS (UK)
  7. Gassco
  8. Equinor
  9. Total
  10. European Commis-sion [691712]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study optimized the design of a methyl diethanolamine CO2 capture unit for clean hydrogen production via steam methane reforming of natural gas. The modified version of the standard MDEA-based CO2 capture process flowsheet was proposed, and the operating conditions were optimized to minimize energy consumption while maximizing the CO2 capture rate. The CO2 capture plant was modeled using an equilibrium-based approach, and the validation of optimization results and verification of absorber and desorber dimensions were conducted.
This work presents an optimized design of a methyl diethanolamine CO2 capture unit for clean hydrogen production via steam methane reforming of natural gas, where CO(2 )is captured from the pressurized water-gas shifted syngas. We propose a modified version of the standard MDEA-based CO2 capture process flowsheet, and we optimize the operating conditions by solving a multi-objective optimization problem to minimize energy consumption while maximizing the CO2 capture rate. In this paper, we opted to model the CO2 capture plant using an equilibrium-based approach. To validate the optimization results obtained and to verify the absorber and desorber dimensions, we sized both columns. Packing heights remain below the threshold of 15 metres and productivity ranges between 0.74 tCO(2)/m(3)h at a capture rate of 90% and 0.35 tCO(2)/m(3)h for a CO2 recovery of 99.8% respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available