4.7 Article

Enhanced process for energy efficient extraction of 1,3-butadiene from a crude C4 cut

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 267, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118656

Keywords

Fluid separation; Process intensification; Process design; Vapor recompression; Energy savings

Funding

  1. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award [WM170003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed novel enhancements to the 1,3-butadiene production process, including modifications to the ED part with intermediate heating and replacing classic columns with a heat pump assisted DWC. Rigorous simulations in Aspen Plus showed that these enhancements significantly reduced energy intensity and total costs of the process, with a payback time of 1 year.
1,3-butadiene is an essential platform chemical for producing rubberlike polymers, which is extracted from C4 hydrocarbons that are produced through steam cracking. The current state-of-the-art technology is the BASF process that uses thermally coupled extractive distillation (ED) followed by two distillation columns. However, the process requires high temperature heat input, thus high cost hot utility and reduces the possibility for process heat integration. To solve these issues, this study proposes novel enhancements: the ED part is modified with intermediate heating and the classic columns are replaced with a heat pump assisted dividing wall column (DWC). Rigorous simulations were carried out in Aspen Plus for a typical ED process. The intermediate reboiler system is designed to maximize the possible process heat recovery. The results show that the heat pump assisted DWC is able to reduce the energy intensity of the classic distillation section of the BASF process by 54.8% and reduces the total annual costs by 29.9%. Additionally, the intermediate reboiler reduces the energy intensity of the ED section by 8.3% while also reducing the CAPEX of the system due to the need for a smaller recycle compressor. In combination, these modifications are able to achieve up to a 21% reduction in the energy intensity of the overall process, with a payback time of 1 year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available