4.6 Article

Measuring Gait Stability in People with Multiple Sclerosis Using Different Sensor Locations and Time Scales

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21124001

Keywords

MS; 6-min walk; 25-foot walk; local dynamic stability; Lyapunov exponent; fatigue; EDSS

Funding

  1. Sanofi-Aventis GmbH, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sensitivity of discriminating PwMS in terms of gait stability is affected by sensor location and LDE measurement time scale. Healthy participants appear to compensate better for perturbations on a longer time scale based on trunk movements, and on a shorter time scale according to foot kinematics.
The evaluation of local divergence exponent (LDE) has been proposed as a common gait stability measure in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, differences in methods of determining LDE may lead to different results. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to determine the effect of different sensor locations and LDE measures on the sensitivity to discriminate PwMS. To accomplish this, 86 PwMS and 30 healthy participants were instructed to complete a six-minute walk wearing inertial sensors attached to the foot, trunk and lumbar spine. Due to possible fatigue effects, the LDE short (similar to 50% of stride) and very short (similar to 5% of stride) were calculated for the remaining first, middle and last 30 strides. The effect of group (PwMS vs. healthy participants) and time (begin, mid, end) and the effect of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and time were assessed with linear random intercepts models. We found that perturbations seem to be better compensated in healthy participants on a longer time scale based on trunk movements and on a shorter time scale (almost instantaneously) according to the foot kinematics. Therefore, we suggest to consider both sensor location and time scale of LDE when calculating local gait stability in PwMS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available