4.6 Article

UAV Block Geometry Design and Camera Calibration: A Simulation Study

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21186090

Keywords

UAV; photogrammetry; camera calibration; GNSS-assisted block orientation; dome effect; Monte Carlo simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Missing acknowledged guidelines and standards in UAV photogrammetry due to the complexity of project goals and parameters. A Monte Carlo simulation study evaluated the accuracy estimation of camera parameters and ground coordinates, finding different project parameters can impact results. Oblique imaging is crucial for accuracy in flat terrain, while ground control density is not a determining factor.
Acknowledged guidelines and standards such as those formerly governing project planning in analogue aerial photogrammetry are still missing in UAV photogrammetry. The reasons are many, from a great variety of projects goals to the number of parameters involved: camera features, flight plan design, block control and georeferencing options, Structure from Motion settings, etc. Above all, perhaps, stands camera calibration with the alternative between pre- and on-the-job approaches. In this paper we present a Monte Carlo simulation study where the accuracy estimation of camera parameters and tie points' ground coordinates is evaluated as a function of various project parameters. A set of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) synthetic photogrammetric blocks, built by varying terrain shape, surveyed area shape, block control (ground and aerial), strip type (longitudinal, cross and oblique), image observation and control data precision has been synthetically generated, overall considering 144 combinations in on-the-job self-calibration. Bias in ground coordinates (dome effect) due to inaccurate pre-calibration has also been investigated. Under the test scenario, the accuracy gap between different block configurations can be close to an order of magnitude. Oblique imaging is confirmed as key requisite in flat terrain, while ground control density is not. Aerial control by accurate camera station positions is overall more accurate and efficient than GCP in flat terrain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available