4.6 Article

Negative Index Metamaterial Lens for Subwavelength Microwave Detection

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21144782

Keywords

metamaterial; lenses; refractive index; microwave sensors; nondestructive testing

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation under the Manufacturing USA [1762331]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1762331] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the design and application of a metamaterial lens in microwave imaging and nondestructive evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that the metamaterial lens combined with a microwave system can achieve high sensitivity detection of subwavelength defects.
Metamaterials are engineered periodic structures designed to have unique properties not encountered in naturally occurring materials. One such unusual property of metamaterials is the ability to exhibit negative refractive index over a prescribed range of frequencies. A lens made of negative refractive index metamaterials can achieve resolution beyond the diffraction limit. This paper presents the design of a metamaterial lens and its use in far-field microwave imaging for subwavelength defect detection in nondestructive evaluation (NDE). Theoretical formulation and numerical studies of the metamaterial lens design are presented followed by experimental demonstration and characterization of metamaterial behavior. Finally, a microwave homodyne receiver-based system is used in conjunction with the metamaterial lens to develop a far-field microwave NDE sensor system. A subwavelength focal spot of size 0.82 lambda was obtained. The system is shown to be sensitive to a defect of size 0.17 lambda x 0.06 lambda in a Teflon sample. Consecutive positions of the defect with a separation of 0.23 lambda was resolvable using the proposed system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available