4.6 Review

Review of Wearable Devices and Data Collection Considerations for Connected Health

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21165589

Keywords

wearable technology; digital healthcare; quantified self (QS); deep learning (DL); neural network (NN)

Funding

  1. Letterkenny Institute of Technology
  2. Donegal, Ireland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wearable sensor technology is increasingly utilized in a variety of applications, including monitoring patient health, assisting with disease diagnosis, and improving patient outcomes. These sensors can detect and quantify specific movements, offering advantages over traditional medical assessments that may not accurately reflect a patient's functional abilities.
Wearable sensor technology has gradually extended its usability into a wide range of well-known applications. Wearable sensors can typically assess and quantify the wearer's physiology and are commonly employed for human activity detection and quantified self-assessment. Wearable sensors are increasingly utilised to monitor patient health, rapidly assist with disease diagnosis, and help predict and often improve patient outcomes. Clinicians use various self-report questionnaires and well-known tests to report patient symptoms and assess their functional ability. These assessments are time consuming and costly and depend on subjective patient recall. Moreover, measurements may not accurately demonstrate the patient's functional ability whilst at home. Wearable sensors can be used to detect and quantify specific movements in different applications. The volume of data collected by wearable sensors during long-term assessment of ambulatory movement can become immense in tuple size. This paper discusses current techniques used to track and record various human body movements, as well as techniques used to measure activity and sleep from long-term data collected by wearable technology devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available