4.6 Article

Transmission Sensitivities of Contact Ultrasonic Transducers and Their Applications

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21134396

Keywords

ultrasonic transducers; transmission sensitivities; calibration; acoustic emission; areal and multiple sensing methods; capacitive sensing; loading effect; receiving sensitivities; antiresonance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on quantifying the transmission and receiving sensitivities of ultrasonic transducers and acoustic emission sensors, extending detection range to lower frequencies, exploring area and multiple sensing methods, and examining transducer loading effects. Results confirm that interfacial wave transmission follows wave propagation theory and that acoustic emission sensors' receiving sensitivity peaks at antiresonance.
In all ultrasonic material evaluation methods, transducers and sensors play a key role of mechanoelectrical conversion. Their transduction characteristics must be known quantitatively in designing and implementing successful structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. Yet, their calibration and verification have lagged behind most other aspects of SHM system development. This study aims to extend recent advances in quantifying the transmission and receiving sensitivities to normally incident longitudinal waves of ultrasonic transducers and acoustic emission sensors. This paper covers extending the range of detection to lower frequencies, expanding to areal and multiple sensing methods and examining transducer loading effects. Using the refined transmission characteristics, the receiving sensitivities of transducers and sensors were reexamined under the conditions representing their actual usage. Results confirm that the interfacial wave transmission is governed by wave propagation theory and that the receiving sensitivity of resonant acoustic emission sensors peaks at antiresonance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available