4.6 Article

An SPRi Biosensor for Determination of the Ovarian Cancer Marker HE4 in Human Plasma

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21103567

Keywords

cancer markers; ovarian cancer; HE4; SPRI biosensors; array of measuring points

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Education and Science [BST-162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An alternative biosensor for the determination of ovarian cancer marker HE4 in blood plasma has been developed, showing acceptable precision and recovery rates. The biosensor's results were in good agreement with commercial tests, validating its diagnostic application, such as studying the influence of ovarian tumor resection on the level of HE4 in blood serum.
Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is an ovarian cancer marker. Various cut-off values of the marker in blood are recommended, depending on the method used for its determination. An alternative biosensor for HE4 determination in blood plasma has been developed. It consists of rabbit polyclonal antibody against HE4, covalently attached to a gold chip via cysteamine linker. The biosensor is used with the non-fluidic array SPRi technique. The linear range of the analytical signal response was found to be 2-120 pM, and the biosensor can be used for the determination of the HE4 marker in the plasma of both healthy subjects and ovarian cancer patients after suitable dilution with a PBS buffer. Precision (6-10%) and recovery (101.8-103.5%) were found to be acceptable, and the LOD was equal to 2 pM. The biosensor was validated by the parallel determination of a series of plasma samples from ovarian cancer patients using the Elecsys HE4 test and the developed biosensor, with a good agreement of the results (a Pearson coefficient of 0.989). An example of the diagnostic application of the developed biosensor is given-the influence of ovarian tumor resection on the level of HE4 in blood serum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available