4.7 Article

Nutrient recovery and microalgae biomass production from urine by membrane photobioreactor at low biomass retention times

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 785, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147423

Keywords

Membrane photobioreactor; Biomass retention time; Biomass productivity; Urine; Nutrient recovery

Funding

  1. Vietnam's National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [105.992019.27]
  2. Domestic Master Scholarship Programme of Vingroup Innovation Foundation (VINIF), Vingroup Big Data Institute (VINBIGDATA) [VINIF.2020.ThS.77]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cultivating microalgae in urine using a lab-scale membrane photobioreactor (MPBR) system, it was found that a low biomass retention time of 7 days resulted in significantly higher biomass productivity and nutrient removal rates.
Urine has been considered as an ideal nutrient source for microalgae cultivation thanks to its composition containing the high concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus. Herein, the microalgae growth in urine was evaluated in a lab-scale membrane photobioreactor (MPBR) system. This work aimed to validate the influence of low biomass retention times (BRT) (10, 7, 5, 3, 2 d) on nutrient remediation and biomass productivity. It revealed that BRT of 7 d resulted in synergistically high biomass production (biomass productivity of 313 mg/L.d) and removal rates (TN of 90.5 mg/L.d and TP of 4.7 mg/L.d). Notably, the short BRT of 2-5 d was not sufficient to trigger actively growing microalgae and thus reduced biomass production rate. In addition, as operated at a low flux of 2 L/m(2).h, MPBR system required no physical cleaning for 100 days of operation. The BRT-dependent biomass concentration played a pivotal role in changing the fouling rate of MPBR; however, the fouling is reversible in the MPBR system under the low flux condition. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available