4.7 Article

Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a microalgae model for wastewater treatment

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 806, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150504

Keywords

Dynamic optimization; Microalgae model; MPBR; Municipal wastewater; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty analysis

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [CTM2014-54980-C2-1-R, CTM2014-54980-C2-2-R, CTM2017-86751-C2-1-R, CTM2017-86751-C2-2-R]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport via a pre-doctoral FPU fellowship [FPU/15/02595]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed a microalgae model applied to a Membrane Photobioreactor (MPBR) pilot plant through a global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. The influential factors of the model were identified, calibrated offline or online, and the model's uncertainty was evaluated. The results indicated a need for offline calibration methods to improve model performance.
The results of a global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a microalgae model applied to a Membrane Photobioreactor (MPBR) pilot plant were assessed. The main goals of this study were: (I) to identify the sensitivity factors of the model through the Morris screening method, i.e. the most influential factors; (II) to calibrate the influential factors online or offline; and (III) to assess the model's uncertainty. Four experimental periods were evaluated, which encompassed a wide range of environmental and operational conditions. Eleven influential factors (e.g. maximum specific growth rate, light intensity and maximum temperature) were identified in the model from a set of 34 kinetic parameters (input factors). These influential factors were preferably calibrated offline and alternatively online. Offline/online calibration provided a unique set of model factor values that were used to match the model results with experimental data for the four experimental periods. A dynamic optimization of these influential factors was conducted, resulting in an enhanced set of values for each period. Model uncertainty was assessed using the uncertainty bands and three uncertainty indices: p-factor, r-factor and ARIL. Uncertainty was dependent on both the number of influential factors identified in each period and the model output analyzed (i.e. biomass, ammonium and phosphate concentration). The uncertainty results revealed a need to apply offline calibration methods to improve model performance. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available