4.7 Article

Microbial fuel cells: Devices for real wastewater treatment, rather than electricity production

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 775, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145904

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell; Wastewater treatment; Reactor design; Installation type; Operating mode

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea Government (MIST) [NRF-2018R1A2A3075622, NRF-2018R1D1A1B07046741]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies on microbial fuel cells (MFCs) using real wastewater have shown that they are primarily small in size, box-shaped, single-chambered, and operated under continuous flow mode with non-domestic wastewater. Despite low power production and energy recovery, these MFCs have demonstrated high COD removal efficiency.
For last two decades, various microbial fuel cells have been studied to treat real wastewater and simultaneously produce electricity. The performance of 106 MFCs using real wastewater were summarized and grouped according to reactor design (size, shape, and whether single chamber), installation type, operating mode, and wastewater type. Most studies operated MFCs with mini size (<1 L) (57%), box shape (50%), single-chamber (60%), chamber-type (94%), operated under continuous flow mode (67%) with non-domestic wastewater (66%). Their maximum power production and net energy recovery were as low as similar to 165 W/m(3) and similar to 1.1 kWh/kgCOD, respectively. However, most MFC studies (75/106) using real wastewater achieved higher than 60% of COD removal efficiencies. In addition, recent MFC studies reported successful treatment of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and antibiotics as well as organics. The review on MFCs using real wastewater suggests that MFC is more proper to apply for wastewater treatment rather than energy production. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available