4.7 Review

Plastic ingestion by Arctic fauna: A review

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 786, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147462

Keywords

Microplastic; Biota; Marine mammals; Fish; Seabirds; Arctic

Funding

  1. Norwegian Polar Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of marine plastic litter varies around the world, with the Arctic not significantly less polluted than more populated areas further south. Climate change and increasing maritime activities are expected to exacerbate plastic pollution in the Arctic, posing a growing threat to Arctic fauna. Research gaps include the need for species biomonitoring, more data from the Russian and European Arctic, and experimental studies on the impacts of plastic ingestion on Arctic species.
The distribution of marine plastic litter is unequal around the world, some areas being more polluted. Given that the Arctic is not a highly populated area, very low levels of plastics are expected. However, the Arctic is not sig-nificantly less polluted than populated areas further south. Plastic has already been found in most compartments of the Arctic Ocean and climate change will likely exacerbate that issue due to sea ice melting and increasing mar-itime activities. The Arctic fauna is, and will be, increasingly exposed to the plastic pollution threat in the coming years and decades. The objective of this review is providing a summary of existing data, as well as perspectives and important knowledge gaps regarding plastic ingestion by Arctic fauna. Among other knowledge gaps, we highlighted the need for a species for biomonitoring of plastic pollution in the Arctic, i.e. the northern fulmar and/or the polar cod, for more data in fauna from the Russian and European Arctic and for experimental studies on impacts of plastic ingestion on Arctic species. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available