4.7 Review

Reductive materials for remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil - A review

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 773, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145654

Keywords

Organic amendments; Iron-bearing reductants; Sulfur-based compounds; Cr(VI)-contaminated soil remediation; Immobilization mechanisms

Funding

  1. National key R&D project of China [2018YFC1802204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774338]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Hunan [2018JJ2488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviews chromium chemistry and materials for reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in contaminated soil remediation, discusses mechanisms of Cr(VI) immobilization in polluted soil, emphasizes the relationship between material remediation performance and soil environmental conditions, and proposes perspectives on future research directions in novel material design and technological development for remediating Cr(VI) contaminated soil.
Chemical reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by reductive materials is the most widely used technology for the remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil due to its high efficiency, adaptability and low cost. This paper reviews chromiumchemistry and thematerials that can effectively reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) for the remediation of Cr(VI)contaminated soil, namely iron-bearing reductants, sulfur-based compounds and organic amendments. Moreover, we discuss the corresponding mechanisms involved in the process of immobilization of Cr(VI) in polluted soil, and emphasize the relationship between the materials remediation performance and soil environmental conditions. Besides, perspectives on the potential future researches of novel materials design and technological development in the remediation of Cr(VI) contaminated soil are also put forward. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available