4.7 Review

Does microplastic really represent a threat? A review of the atmospheric contamination sources and potential impacts

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 777, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146020

Keywords

Airborne microplastics; Sources of airborne microplastics; Synthetic textiles; Human exposure; Environmental impacts

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52074176]
  2. Shandong Society for Environmental Science [202017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microplastics are considered a major atmospheric contaminant, predominantly in the form of fibers and synthetic textiles, posing potential health impacts on humans. However, data on their presence and health effects remain limited.
Microplastics (MPs) are regarded as one of the major atmospheric contaminants that have gained wide attention across the globe in the current dispensation. Airborne MPs have been collected in atmospheric fallouts, in indoor and outdoor air as well as along roadways and indoor dust. The most dominating constituent shapes and forms of identified airborne MPs are fibers and synthetic textiles, respectively. With the breathing mechanism as a spontaneous practice for survival, the inhalation of airborne MPs is an inevitable deal. The level of toxicity of MPs to organisms stems from its physiochemical speciation. The smaller size and almost weightless nature make it possible to suspend in the atmosphere and be inhaled and create potential health problems. Nonetheless, the data available concerning the presence of airborne MPs and its environmental and human health impacts is limited. In this review, we extensively discuss the rigorous and suitable methodologies adopted for the analysis of airborne MPs in previous studies. The characteristics and sources of airborne MPs, the potential health impacts on humans, and some mitigating measures have also been discussed thoroughly. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available