4.8 Article

Stabilizing perovskite-substrate interfaces for high-performance perovskite modules

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 373, Issue 6557, Pages 902-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6323

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Hybrid Organic Inorganic Semiconductors for Energy (CHOISE), an Energy Frontier Research Center - Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science within the US Department of Energy
  2. Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N6833520C0390]
  3. ONR [N00014-18-1-2239]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that DMSO liquid additive trapped in perovskite-substrate interfaces during film formation led to voids, accelerating film degradation. Partial replacement of DMSO with solid-state carbohydrazide reduced interfacial voids and increased stability. Blade-coated p-i-n structure PSCs achieved a maximum PCE of 23.6% without efficiency loss after stability tests, demonstrating improved efficiency and stability with the new approach.
The interfaces of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are important in determining their efficiency and stability, but the morphology and stability of imbedded perovskite-substrate interfaces have received less attention than have top interfaces. We found that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which is a liquid additive broadly applied to enhance perovskite film morphology, was trapped during film formation and led to voids at perovskite-substrate interfaces that accelerated the film degradation under illumination. Partial replacement of DMSO with solid-state carbohydrazide reduces interfacial voids. A maximum stabilized power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 23.6% was realized for blade-coated p-type/intrinsic/n-type (p-i-n) structure PSCs with no efficiency loss after 550-hour operational stability tests at 60 degrees C. The perovskite mini-modules showed certified PCEs of 19.3 and 19.2%, with aperture areas of 18.1 and 50.0 square centimeters, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available