4.8 Article

Cell size controlled in plants using DNA content as an internal scale

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 372, Issue 6547, Pages 1176-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abb4348

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. John Innes Foundation
  2. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Institute Strategic Programme Grant [BB/J004588/1]
  3. European Commission Marie-Curie Fellowship [838718]
  4. European Commission [ERC-2018-AdG_833617]
  5. Ministry of Science and Innovation [RTI2018-094793-B-I00]
  6. Fundacion Ramon Areces
  7. Banco de Santander
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [838718] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that cell size variability in the Arabidopsis shoot stem cell niche is corrected by adjusting the growth period before DNA synthesis. KRP4 and FBL17 proteins play key roles in removing excess cell cycle regulators, ensuring daughter cells are born with comparable amounts of KRP4. This suggests a potential mechanism where a cell cycle regulator associated with mitotic chromosomes can read DNA content as a cell size-independent scale.
How eukaryotic cells assess and maintain sizes specific for their species and cell type remains unclear. We show that in the Arabidopsis shoot stem cell niche, cell size variability caused by asymmetric divisions is corrected by adjusting the growth period before DNA synthesis. KIP-related protein 4 (KRP4) inhibits progression to DNA synthesis and associates with mitotic chromosomes. The F BOX-LIKE 17 (FBL17) protein removes excess KRP4. Consequently, daughter cells are born with comparable amounts of KRP4. Inhibitor dilution models predicted that KRP4 inherited through chromatin would robustly regulate size, whereas inheritance of excess free KRP4 would disrupt size homeostasis, as confirmed by mutant analyses. We propose that a cell cycle regulator, stabilized by association with mitotic chromosomes, reads DNA content as a cell size-independent scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available