4.3 Editorial Material

Diffusion of innovations: a guiding framework for public health

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 533-537

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14034948211014104

Keywords

Health related behavior; innovation diffusion; diffusion; innovation; social networks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The DOI model and SNT theory are two different approaches to studying the behavior change process. The DOI model focuses on the stages and characteristics of innovation diffusion, while the SNT theory explains the impact of social networks on behavior change.
Exploring the behavior change process has been of interest and importance to public health professionals, to translate research into practice. Diffusion of innovations (DOI) model has been extensively applied in public health to examine the process by which innovation is passively communicated to individuals and groups. It builds on a staged model of awareness, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation; and categorizes communities into innovators (2.5%), early adopters (13.5%), early majority (34%), late majority (34%) and laggards (16%). It reflects on the diversity of strategies to be applied for different cadres of the society to bring about a wholistic change. Nonetheless, DOI suffers from 'pro-innovation' and 'individual blame' bias, as it fails to account for the influence of societal, cultural, and extraneous factors affecting individual behavior change. The social networks theory (SNT) in contrast, explains behavior change based on social networks and their influences. It builds on the constructs of homophily, centralization, reciprocity, transitivity, and density; and fills the void in the DOI model. We suggest public health professionals to combine the constructs of DOI and SNT in rolling out behavior change interventions, to yield a comprehensive approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available