4.7 Article

Evolution of Permeability in Sandstone During Confined Brazilian Testing

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 2651-2664

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-021-02527-7

Keywords

Permeability; Confined Brazilian test; Confined extension; Intermediate principal stress; Strength; Fracture initiation

Funding

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory [LA-UR-20-30383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Permeability measurements were conducted on sandstone samples during confined Brazilian strength tests, revealing a significant increase in permeability before reaching peak load, with the increase inversely proportional to the intermediate principal stress.
Permeability measurements were made on sandstone during confined Brazilian strength tests. The test involves 50 mm diameter disk-shaped, jacketed samples that are subjected to confining stresses while they are diametrically loaded. Specially designed end caps allow for concurrent gas flow measurements. The test configuration allows for the samples to be subjected to a range of stresses, with the confining stress as the intermediate principal stress. The majority of the tests measured permeability during loading to failure in the confined extension region. The permeability of the sandstone sample increases significantly well before the peak load is reached due to newly formed microcracks that continue to coalesce and dilate with further loading. Permeability increases are inversely proportional to the intermediate principal stress as increased confining pressures suppress growth, coalescence, and dilation of microcracks. Additional testing includes unloading and reloading cycles prior to failure. With each unloading-reloading cycle, permeability at comparable stresses is increased compared to the previous cycle, consistent with increasing damage in the form of an expanding microcrack network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available