4.4 Article

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Journal

REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA
Volume 74, Issue 9, Pages 790-799

Publisher

EDICIONES DOYMA S A
DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016

Keywords

Publishing guide; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Medical writing

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [DRF-2018-11-ST2-048] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The PRISMA statement was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report the purpose, methods, and findings of their reviews. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement, includes new reporting guidance, and modifies the structure and presentation of items for better implementation.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews. (C) 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available