4.5 Article

Association between gastroprotective agents and risk of incident interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106482

Keywords

Systemic sclerosis; Interstitial lung disease; Gastroprotective agents; Prevention; Observational study

Funding

  1. Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM) Research Center
  2. University of Montreal Scleroderma Research Chair
  3. CIHR [FRN 83518]
  4. Scleroderma Society of Canada
  5. Cure Scleroderma Foundation
  6. INOVA Diagnostics Inc. (San Diego, CA)
  7. Euroimmun (Lubeck, Germany)
  8. FRQ-S
  9. Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
  10. Canadian Arthritis Network (CAN)
  11. Mikrogen GmbH (Neuried, Germany)
  12. Dr. Fooke Laboratorien GmbH (Neuss, Germany)
  13. Scleroderma Society of Saskatchewan, Sclerodermie Quebec
  14. Scleroderma Society of Ontario
  15. CHUM Division of Rheumatology
  16. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec -Sante (FRQ-S)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this large retrospective cohort study, the use of gastroprotective or promotility agents was not associated with a reduced risk of development of clinically apparent SSc-ILD.
Objectives: Although interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurs in over half of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and represents a leading cause of mortality, there are currently no preventative strategies. We evaluated if gastro-protective agents were associated with a lower incident risk of SSc-ILD. Methods: An SSc cohort without clinically apparent ILD at baseline was constructed from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group registry. The primary exposure was any use of gastroprotective agents. Treatment with promotility agents was assessed as a secondary exposure. Time to development of clinically apparent ILD was compared between exposed and unexposed person-time, using a multivariable marginal structural Cox model incorporating inverse probability of treatment weights to address time-varying confounding. Results: In total, 798 subjects met inclusion criteria. At cohort entry, median disease duration was 7.6 (IQR 3.9-15.6) years. During a median 4.4 (IQR 2.6-7.2) years of follow-up, 158 new ILD cases were diagnosed, for a crude incidence of 4.4 (95% CI 3.8-5.1) events per 100 person-years. Most (2085, 73.4%) person-visits were exposed to gastroprotective agents, 579 (20.4%) were exposed to promotility agents, and 554 (19.5%) were exposed to both agents. The marginal structural weighted hazard ratio (HR) for incident ILD related to gastroprotective agents was 0.86 (95% CI 0.52-1.41). When exposure was defined as treatment with promotility agents, the weighted adjusted HR was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.35-1.77). Conclusion: In this large retrospective cohort study, we were unable to demonstrate a protective role for gastroprotective and promotility agents in preventing clinically apparent SSc-ILD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available